Analog and chemical photography, films, darkroom
Discussion Last answer Replies / Clicks
Deleted user

[Personal Blog] Inspired by a Kids 35mm Camera Photo Contest

Quote: Deleted user 01.12.21, 19:01Several months ago, I took part in a kids camera challenge. The challenge consisted of locating a kids 35mm camera, take the entire roll of pictures, have the film developed within one week and submit these images to the judges. My images were overlooked by the judges. Since then I've wanted to try something differant.

Instead of using a kids Fujifilm waterproof camera, I've elected to try the Holga 120N Medium format plastic toy camera. Medium format is new to me and something I thought about getting into back in the 70's but never had the chance. My objective to test the modified Holga 120N camera along with my experimental polarizing filter. Finding out later, the 52mm lens ring fits over the existing Holga plastic lens. But over time, the filter mount kept falling off. I ended up making a small foil tab, bent over the lens ring that would apply just enough pressure to hold the generic filter mount in place.

Another add on, we had the shop creation a 3D printed shutter release mount. In conjunction with a $90.00 release cable (the most expensive thing about this https://www.my-milestonecard.com entire outfit). The camera will be used strictly for long exposures. It's been difficult loading the film into the camera when a person like myself have arthritic hands. One thing I'd change about the Holga, I'd like to see a larger film advance knob.

Since getting the camera, I've used 11 rolls of film, My favorite is the Kodak Tri-x 400, but I also threw in the Ilford ISO 50 and one roll of Kodak Portra 160 just to get an idea of what to expect. At the end of this week, I'll finally have a chance to send at least 4 roll of the 120 film, and I'll make sure as to include the Ilford & Portra film. But will months of testing and shooting pay off or be a waste and a big disappointment. I wont know until the lab starts to develop something. However they have said that they will snip test the film before developing the entire roll.

I'm hoping to have something to show for my efforts very soon.


Hello,

Your journey with the Holga 120N sounds like a true labor of love and dedication to the craft of photography. The modifications you’ve made, especially considering the challenges posed by arthritis, are commendable. It’s clear that you’ve put a lot of thought and effort into adapting the camera to your needs and creative vision.

The anticipation of waiting for film to develop can indeed be nerve-wracking, but it’s also part of the charm of film photography. The fact that you’ve experimented with different films like the Kodak Tri-x 400, Ilford ISO 50, and Kodak Portra 160 shows your commitment to exploring the medium’s possibilities.

Remember, the value of your work isn’t solely determined by the outcome of these rolls. The process you’ve undertaken, the learning, and the enjoyment you’ve found in photography are just as important. Whether the results meet your expectations or not, you’ve gained experience and perhaps even found joy in the moments you captured.

When you receive your developed films, regardless of the outcome, consider it a success in its own right. You’ve revived a passion from the '70s, navigated physical limitations, and embraced the unpredictability of film—all of which are achievements to be proud of.

I’m rooting for your success and hope that the developed pictures bring you the satisfaction you’re looking for. Keep embracing the experimental spirit of photography!
11.04.24, 11:09
Quote: Deleted user 01.12.21, 19:01Several months ago, I took part in a kids camera challenge. The challenge consisted of locating a kids 35mm camera, take the entire roll of pictures, have the film developed within one week and submit these images to the judges. My images were overlooked by the judges. Since then I've wanted to try something differant.

Instead of using a kids Fujifilm waterproof camera, I've elected to try the Holga 120N Medium format plastic toy camera. Medium format is new to me and something I thought about getting into back in the 70's but never had the chance. My objective to test the modified Holga 120N camera along with my experimental polarizing filter. Finding out later, the 52mm lens ring fits over the existing Holga plastic lens. But over time, the filter mount kept falling off. I ended up making a small foil tab, bent over the lens ring that would apply just enough pressure to hold the generic filter mount in place.

Another add on, we had the shop creation a 3D printed shutter release mount. In conjunction with a $90.00 release cable (the most expensive thing about this https://www.my-milestonecard.com entire outfit). The camera will be used strictly for long exposures. It's been difficult loading the film into the camera when a person like myself have arthritic hands. One thing I'd change about the Holga, I'd like to see a larger film advance knob.

Since getting the camera, I've used 11 rolls of film, My favorite is the Kodak Tri-x 400, but I also threw in the Ilford ISO 50 and one roll of Kodak Portra 160 just to get an idea of what to expect. At the end of this week, I'll finally have a chance to send at least 4 roll of the 120 film, and I'll make sure as to include the Ilford & Portra film. But will months of testing and shooting pay off or be a waste and a big disappointment. I wont know until the lab starts to develop something. However they have said that they will snip test the film before developing the entire roll.

I'm hoping to have something to show for my efforts very soon.


Hello,

Your journey with the Holga 120N sounds like a true labor of love and dedication to the craft of photography. The modifications you’ve made, especially considering the challenges posed by arthritis, are commendable. It’s clear that you’ve put a lot of thought and effort into adapting the camera to your needs and creative vision.

The anticipation of waiting for film to develop can indeed be nerve-wracking, but it’s also part of the charm of film photography. The fact that you’ve experimented with different films like the Kodak Tri-x 400, Ilford ISO 50, and Kodak Portra 160 shows your commitment to exploring the medium’s possibilities.

Remember, the value of your work isn’t solely determined by the outcome of these rolls. The process you’ve undertaken, the learning, and the enjoyment you’ve found in photography are just as important. Whether the results meet your expectations or not, you’ve gained experience and perhaps even found joy in the moments you captured.

When you receive your developed films, regardless of the outcome, consider it a success in its own right. You’ve revived a passion from the '70s, navigated physical limitations, and embraced the unpredictability of film—all of which are achievements to be proud of.

I’m rooting for your success and hope that the developed pictures bring you the satisfaction you’re looking for. Keep embracing the experimental spirit of photography!
1,235 clicks
Andy Collier

Zone system

27.03.24, 09:10
2,204 clicks
Deleted user

tri-x 400 dynamic range

Quote: Deleted user 19.04.15, 20:38Hi.

I'm looking into shooting on film as I like the look and feel of it. So I bought a canon ae1 and a 50mm lens from ebay. Got a roll of tri-x400 film and just went out and shot the whole roll in one day. I dropped it off at a local foto store but was a bit disappointed when I got the developed and printed fotos back. Generally all shots are lacking contrast. Looking at it in photoshop the values are clipped at a dark grey and light grey. So no real whites and no real blacks. I used the zone system to expose my shots but accidentally got a few underexposed shots and even they are clipped at a dark grey. https://www.surveyzo.com/lazy-acres-survey/
I'd like to look into developing the film myself but just want to find out at which stage I made a mistake.
Am I exposing wrong? But even then whites and blacks shouldn't be clipped, right?
Did the photo store do something wrong? Looking at the negative, as far as I can tell the range looks quite all right, completely transparent and fully opaque.
Maybe the negatives got fogged?

Thanks for your help,
Fabian


Hello,

It's possible that the issue lies with the film development process or handling at the photo store. If your negatives look fine with a good range of tones, but the printed photos lack contrast and have clipped values in Photoshop, it might indicate a problem during printing. It's unlikely that proper exposure alone would cause the extreme lack of contrast you're describing. The negatives being transparent and opaque suggests they are well-exposed.

Fogging of the negatives is less likely if you didn't notice any unusual artifacts or haziness on them. To narrow down the issue, you could try another roll of film, ensuring proper exposure, and have it developed at a different lab or attempt developing it yourself. This would help determine if the problem was with the initial development process. Remember that learning to develop film yourself can be a rewarding experience and give you more control over the final results.
10.08.23, 12:27
Quote: Deleted user 19.04.15, 20:38Hi.

I'm looking into shooting on film as I like the look and feel of it. So I bought a canon ae1 and a 50mm lens from ebay. Got a roll of tri-x400 film and just went out and shot the whole roll in one day. I dropped it off at a local foto store but was a bit disappointed when I got the developed and printed fotos back. Generally all shots are lacking contrast. Looking at it in photoshop the values are clipped at a dark grey and light grey. So no real whites and no real blacks. I used the zone system to expose my shots but accidentally got a few underexposed shots and even they are clipped at a dark grey. https://www.surveyzo.com/lazy-acres-survey/
I'd like to look into developing the film myself but just want to find out at which stage I made a mistake.
Am I exposing wrong? But even then whites and blacks shouldn't be clipped, right?
Did the photo store do something wrong? Looking at the negative, as far as I can tell the range looks quite all right, completely transparent and fully opaque.
Maybe the negatives got fogged?

Thanks for your help,
Fabian


Hello,

It's possible that the issue lies with the film development process or handling at the photo store. If your negatives look fine with a good range of tones, but the printed photos lack contrast and have clipped values in Photoshop, it might indicate a problem during printing. It's unlikely that proper exposure alone would cause the extreme lack of contrast you're describing. The negatives being transparent and opaque suggests they are well-exposed.

Fogging of the negatives is less likely if you didn't notice any unusual artifacts or haziness on them. To narrow down the issue, you could try another roll of film, ensuring proper exposure, and have it developed at a different lab or attempt developing it yourself. This would help determine if the problem was with the initial development process. Remember that learning to develop film yourself can be a rewarding experience and give you more control over the final results.
7,054 clicks
desertar

band proofs???

25.01.23, 06:32
5,945 clicks
clarissaaa

what's a good amateur analog camera?

12.06.20, 20:06
12,556 clicks
To the
top