Photos
Explore
Subjects
Special
People
Nude
Nature
DigiArt
Youth
Travel
Popular photos of the fotocommunity
Constructive feedback requested
New photos in the community
New photos international
Most popular new entries
Photos of new members
Editors’ Choice
Photo of the hour
Community
Voting
Forum
Photography
Accessories
Analog Photography
Creative Photography
Digiart
Digital Photography
Beginners
Miscellaneous
General
Meet and greet
fotocommunity help
Premium
Marketplace
Members talk
Nude Photography
all forums
Events
Photo contests
Members
Models
More
Portfolio
Voting
All sections
Help
Membership
Sign up
Premium
Extended search
Accessories
<
1
2
3
4
5
...
13
>
Photography Accessories, lenses, tripods ...
Discussion
Last answer
Replies / Clicks
Graduated grey filter
Tor-Henrik Furmyr
14.04.07, 11:39
In sunsets the lighting conditions vary a lot, depending on the height of the sun above the horizon. You may need a wider range of ND grads to deal with it.
blugir
25.07.18, 04:00
blugir
25.07.18, 04:00
In sunsets the lighting conditions vary a lot, depending on the height of the sun above the horizon. You may need a wider range of ND grads to deal with it.
20
24,213 clicks
Tamron Reisezoom für Nikon
Hedi de Zilva
01.07.18, 22:16
Hallo, hat jemand Erfahrung mit Tamron B028N Reisezoom für Nikon, 18mm - 400 mm, f/3.5-6.3?
Hedi de Zilva
01.07.18, 22:16
Hedi de Zilva
01.07.18, 22:16
Hallo, hat jemand Erfahrung mit Tamron B028N Reisezoom für Nikon, 18mm - 400 mm, f/3.5-6.3?
2
12,828 clicks
Domande su Comportamento Fotografo
Matteo Mauro
08.12.17, 17:30
Ciao, buonasera.
Il comportamento del tuo fotografo non è certo la quintessenza della professionalità, tuttavia, dal punto di vista giuridico si è comportato secondo norma di legge.
Partendo dal fatto che i file digitali sono assimilati ai negativi fisici, ne segue che:
1) E' corretto che gli originali vengano custoditi presso lo studio del fotografo, sempre nel rispetto delle norme sulla privacy (non puo' avvenire pubblicazione senza assenso).
2) E' corretto che il committente non pretenda la consegna incondizionata di tali originali, ma la richieda a fronte di un giusto compenso.
3) E' corretto che il fotografo non consegni gli originali "di default", ma dia la possibilita' di riscattare la quota di "proprieta'" del committente.
4) Conseguentemente, sono invece sbagliate le posizioni sia del committente che pretende la consegna su sola richiesta, come anche del fotografo che si rifiuti, ad ogni costo, di consegnarli.
Queste indicazioni valgono IN ASSENZA di ACCORDI espliciti sulla disponibilita' degli originali. Se esistono scritture di accordi interpersonali, valgono tali accordi.
Esiste una sentenza della Corte di Cassazione che si e' pronunciata in tal senso, con sentenza del 28/6/1980 n. 4094: la proprieta' dei negativi di ritratto e di cerimonie come matrimonio e simili e' del fotografo, e non del committente.
Suprema corte di Cassazione civile, sez I, 28/06/1980 n. 4094, reperibile - fra gli altri - in Giust. civ. Mass. 1980, fasc. 6. Foro it. 1980, I, 2121, Giust. civ. 1980, I, 2101, che recita: "Nell'ipotesi di ritratto fotografico eseguito su commissione, regolata dall'art. 98, I. 22 aprile 1941 n. 633 sul diritto d'autore, il committente, diversamente da quanto stabilito dall'art. 88 comma 3 di detta legge per le fotografie di cose in suo possesso, non acquista il diritto esclusivo di utilizzazione della fotografia, il quale rimane al fotografo, pur concorrendo con quello della persona fotografata o dei suoi aventi causa di pubblicare e riprodurre liberamente la fotografia medesima, salvo il pagamento al fotografo di un equo corrispettivo nel caso che la utilizzino commercialmente. Nell'ipotesi indicata, pertanto, ove manchi un diverso patto, deve ritenersi che il fotografo conserva la proprieta' del negativo e non e' tenuto a consegnarlo al committente."
Tuttavia, dato che il committente (o comunque le persone ritratte) conserva la facolta' di usare tali immagini (come determinato dall' art. 96 legge 633/41), ecco che esiste anche in capo a loro - cioe' al committente del ritratto - un diritto a usare tali originali.
Questo significa che gli originali del servizio ( ritratto, foto tessera, book, matrimonio, ecc ecc ) - in assenza di patti scritti - restano correttamente al fotografo (vedi sopra), il quale, tuttavia, su richiesta e dietro pagamento deve consegnare gli originali al committente che li voglia riscattare.
Dal canto suo, il committente NON ha titolo per pretendere tali originali (o i files) senza pagare un apposito e congruo compenso.
Saluti
Vincenzo
Vincenzo Caniparoli
14.12.17, 21:34
Vincenzo Caniparoli
14.12.17, 21:34
Ciao, buonasera.
Il comportamento del tuo fotografo non è certo la quintessenza della professionalità, tuttavia, dal punto di vista giuridico si è comportato secondo norma di legge.
Partendo dal fatto che i file digitali sono assimilati ai negativi fisici, ne segue che:
1) E' corretto che gli originali vengano custoditi presso lo studio del fotografo, sempre nel rispetto delle norme sulla privacy (non puo' avvenire pubblicazione senza assenso).
2) E' corretto che il committente non pretenda la consegna incondizionata di tali originali, ma la richieda a fronte di un giusto compenso.
3) E' corretto che il fotografo non consegni gli originali "di default", ma dia la possibilita' di riscattare la quota di "proprieta'" del committente.
4) Conseguentemente, sono invece sbagliate le posizioni sia del committente che pretende la consegna su sola richiesta, come anche del fotografo che si rifiuti, ad ogni costo, di consegnarli.
Queste indicazioni valgono IN ASSENZA di ACCORDI espliciti sulla disponibilita' degli originali. Se esistono scritture di accordi interpersonali, valgono tali accordi.
Esiste una sentenza della Corte di Cassazione che si e' pronunciata in tal senso, con sentenza del 28/6/1980 n. 4094: la proprieta' dei negativi di ritratto e di cerimonie come matrimonio e simili e' del fotografo, e non del committente.
Suprema corte di Cassazione civile, sez I, 28/06/1980 n. 4094, reperibile - fra gli altri - in Giust. civ. Mass. 1980, fasc. 6. Foro it. 1980, I, 2121, Giust. civ. 1980, I, 2101, che recita: "Nell'ipotesi di ritratto fotografico eseguito su commissione, regolata dall'art. 98, I. 22 aprile 1941 n. 633 sul diritto d'autore, il committente, diversamente da quanto stabilito dall'art. 88 comma 3 di detta legge per le fotografie di cose in suo possesso, non acquista il diritto esclusivo di utilizzazione della fotografia, il quale rimane al fotografo, pur concorrendo con quello della persona fotografata o dei suoi aventi causa di pubblicare e riprodurre liberamente la fotografia medesima, salvo il pagamento al fotografo di un equo corrispettivo nel caso che la utilizzino commercialmente. Nell'ipotesi indicata, pertanto, ove manchi un diverso patto, deve ritenersi che il fotografo conserva la proprieta' del negativo e non e' tenuto a consegnarlo al committente."
Tuttavia, dato che il committente (o comunque le persone ritratte) conserva la facolta' di usare tali immagini (come determinato dall' art. 96 legge 633/41), ecco che esiste anche in capo a loro - cioe' al committente del ritratto - un diritto a usare tali originali.
Questo significa che gli originali del servizio ( ritratto, foto tessera, book, matrimonio, ecc ecc ) - in assenza di patti scritti - restano correttamente al fotografo (vedi sopra), il quale, tuttavia, su richiesta e dietro pagamento deve consegnare gli originali al committente che li voglia riscattare.
Dal canto suo, il committente NON ha titolo per pretendere tali originali (o i files) senza pagare un apposito e congruo compenso.
Saluti
Vincenzo
2
18,697 clicks
hello!!!
kwokkin
13.09.17, 05:26
hello!Sightfeeling is a group of Hong Kong people who are passionate about taking photos. We want to promote blind photography and support the blind photographers in Hong Kong.
In 2018, we will be organizing a photo exhibition for the blind photographers. In order to achieve this, we have joined a program called "Dream Plan", the winning candidates will be given HK$10,000 to achieve their dreams, which is holding an exhibition to us.
Your help is important! You can show support by like, comment and share this video. Thank you very much for making this happen.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_ ... 7164034260
kwokkin
13.09.17, 05:26
kwokkin
13.09.17, 05:26
hello!Sightfeeling is a group of Hong Kong people who are passionate about taking photos. We want to promote blind photography and support the blind photographers in Hong Kong.
In 2018, we will be organizing a photo exhibition for the blind photographers. In order to achieve this, we have joined a program called "Dream Plan", the winning candidates will be given HK$10,000 to achieve their dreams, which is holding an exhibition to us.
Your help is important! You can show support by like, comment and share this video. Thank you very much for making this happen.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_ ... 7164034260
1
16,736 clicks
Canon to Nikon adapter
__GLM__
13.08.15, 14:56
It depends on the kind of lenses that you have. You can use:
Rokinon T1.5 Cine Lens Kit for Canon EF-Mount. The lenses share a T-stop range of 1.5 to 22mm. The included lenses feature Canon EF lens mounts and cover full-frame sensors. Ultra Multi-Coating (UMC) on the lenses improves light transmission and adds resistance to ghosting and flares. Each lens includes a detachable lens hood.
Rokinon 24mm T1.5 Cine ED AS IF UMC Lens for Canon EF Mount. This lens is compatible with full-frame sensors and can also be used on APS-C-sized sensors, where the 35mm-equivalent focal length will be 38.4mm. The optical construction incorporates four extra-low dispersion elements, as well as two aspherical elements, to reduce chromatic aberration and distortion to produce sharper imagery. Additionally, a UMC coating has been applied to lens elements to minimize lens flare and ghosting for more contrast-rich images.
Rokinon 35mm T1.5 Cine AS UMC Lens for Canon EF Mount. This lens is compatible with full-frame sensors and can also be used on APS-C-sized sensors, where the 35mm-equivalent focal length will be 56mm. The optical construction incorporates two high refractive index elements and one aspherical element to reduce chromatic aberrations and distortion to produce sharper imagery. Additionally, a UMC coating has been applied to lens elements to minimize lens flare and ghosting for more contrast-rich images.
Rokinon 85mm T1.5 Cine Lens for Canon EF. The 85mm has a minimum focus distance of 3.6'. Internal focusing minimizes the effects of lens breathing, which insures a more consistent angle-of-view when adjusting focus. The lens is composed of 9 elements in 7 groups, including one aspherical element to reduce spherical aberrations. In addition, a multi-coated elements help improve light transmission.
Max Simson
13.08.17, 21:26
Max Simson
13.08.17, 21:26
It depends on the kind of lenses that you have. You can use:
Rokinon T1.5 Cine Lens Kit for Canon EF-Mount. The lenses share a T-stop range of 1.5 to 22mm. The included lenses feature Canon EF lens mounts and cover full-frame sensors. Ultra Multi-Coating (UMC) on the lenses improves light transmission and adds resistance to ghosting and flares. Each lens includes a detachable lens hood.
Rokinon 24mm T1.5 Cine ED AS IF UMC Lens for Canon EF Mount. This lens is compatible with full-frame sensors and can also be used on APS-C-sized sensors, where the 35mm-equivalent focal length will be 38.4mm. The optical construction incorporates four extra-low dispersion elements, as well as two aspherical elements, to reduce chromatic aberration and distortion to produce sharper imagery. Additionally, a UMC coating has been applied to lens elements to minimize lens flare and ghosting for more contrast-rich images.
Rokinon 35mm T1.5 Cine AS UMC Lens for Canon EF Mount. This lens is compatible with full-frame sensors and can also be used on APS-C-sized sensors, where the 35mm-equivalent focal length will be 56mm. The optical construction incorporates two high refractive index elements and one aspherical element to reduce chromatic aberrations and distortion to produce sharper imagery. Additionally, a UMC coating has been applied to lens elements to minimize lens flare and ghosting for more contrast-rich images.
Rokinon 85mm T1.5 Cine Lens for Canon EF. The 85mm has a minimum focus distance of 3.6'. Internal focusing minimizes the effects of lens breathing, which insures a more consistent angle-of-view when adjusting focus. The lens is composed of 9 elements in 7 groups, including one aspherical element to reduce spherical aberrations. In addition, a multi-coated elements help improve light transmission.
2
13,351 clicks
How do I upload a photo to my post?
Fanpo
24.07.17, 18:51
I just came in to play so I didn't quite understand.
Fanpo
24.07.17, 18:54
Fanpo
24.07.17, 18:54
I just came in to play so I didn't quite understand.
2
1,831 clicks
Exercices hebdomadaires 2017 : fil des participants
PERSYN Thérèse
02.01.17, 19:24
le thème de la luxure nous a offert de belles déclinaisons sur la Luxure dans des compositions suggestives, toutes aussi subtiles, variées et bien composées..! Bravo à tous les participants pour leurs clichés & Mille merci au jury d avoir retenu " sans retenue " cette extase de Femme dans la lumière..! je suis trés touchée..!
amts marie
† aixoise
05.06.17, 19:49
† aixoise
05.06.17, 19:49
le thème de la luxure nous a offert de belles déclinaisons sur la Luxure dans des compositions suggestives, toutes aussi subtiles, variées et bien composées..! Bravo à tous les participants pour leurs clichés & Mille merci au jury d avoir retenu " sans retenue " cette extase de Femme dans la lumière..! je suis trés touchée..!
amts marie
105
8,183 clicks
How to sell a Linhof Technica 3000 in Berlin?
DrFolAmour
01.06.17, 11:52
Hello everybody,
I've got a Linhof camera with lenses and other accessories from my parents (they were photographers) to sell, but I don't really know how to find people interested by such a camera, can't be used by everyone. Any ideas on how to find interested people around Berlin?
cheers!
DrFolAmour
01.06.17, 11:52
DrFolAmour
01.06.17, 11:52
Hello everybody,
I've got a Linhof camera with lenses and other accessories from my parents (they were photographers) to sell, but I don't really know how to find people interested by such a camera, can't be used by everyone. Any ideas on how to find interested people around Berlin?
cheers!
1
4,009 clicks
New Here
Maen Wawi
04.11.15, 16:11
Quote:
Maen Wawi
08.11.15, 17:11
Thank you ;)
You are most welcome :)
Anila Jain
27.02.16, 10:18
Anila Jain
27.02.16, 10:18
Quote:
Maen Wawi
08.11.15, 17:11
Thank you ;)
You are most welcome :)
4
3,810 clicks
Purchase New Intermediate Camera vs. Older Professional
Christopher Trauco
03.03.15, 03:44
As someone recently in a similar position (but not going to college to study the subject), can I suggest?
You will learn much more about photography in general by using film rather than (or as well as) digital. Digital is good too, but film teaches you more. It is these days not expensive - you can buy a good quality 35mm film SLR for well under £200/€200. If you start with black-and-white film you can develop it at home yourself very easily and cheaply, then scan the negatives into your computer.
As for digital, whilst I think mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras are the future there's no doubt that right now conventional digital SLRs are the best, most flexible and probably cheapest way other than point-and-shoot bridge cameras (some of which are actually very good). I'd wait for MILC technology to stabilise before investing large amounts of money in it.
It is NOT about equipment, it is about you. In fact, I'd recommend restricting yourself to cheaper, simpler kit because it is this that will bring out the creativity, part of which is working round the limitations of what the camera and lens will allow you to portray. Thousands of Euros of equipment won't make you a better photographer, whereas a good photographer can get excellent images from a disposable camera. Note especially that film is less susceptible to technological advance than digital, the fundamentals not having changed for decades.
I'd suggest buying a used camera. Digital technology changes rapidly, so what today costs €10,000 tomorrow will be a few hundred in a second-hand shop. An "outdated" digital SLR will still produce perfectly good images capable of printing at A3 size or even larger. You don't really need more than about 10-12 megapixels unless you're doing exhibition size prints.
Lenses are more important than the camera. If you can afford it, buy a film and a digital SLR of the same brand so you can use the same lenses on both. Since I started using my father's AE-1 in the 1970s, my preference is for Canon, but Nikon is just as good, it's simply a matter of personal preference. Both have a very wide selection of lenses. Get a Canon EOS 35mm SLR and you can use modern EF-type autofocus lenses. The range of usable Nikon lenses is even greater since their old film and current digital models (largely) use the same lens mount design, whereas Canon changed from FD to EF in 1987 and the two are not interchangeable.
Not knowing enough about Nikon or other types, I would make Canon-specific recommendations so - a Canon 700D or 70D crop-frame digital SLR if you want new, or a used 450D for cheapness; a Canon EOS 3, 30 or 33 film SLR; the EF 50mm f/1.8 prime lens because it is cheap and optically good; a macro lens of 100mm focal length; a modest telephoto zoom; a wide-angle if you want interesting perspectives. You say video appeals to you - the Canon 70D is very good for video, especially coupled with some of the EF-S lenses with STM focusing motors. If you want old-school everything manual still photography, then get a Canon AE-1 and some FD type lenses.
But most of all, enjoy.
euangray
28.04.15, 23:03
euangray
28.04.15, 23:03
As someone recently in a similar position (but not going to college to study the subject), can I suggest?
You will learn much more about photography in general by using film rather than (or as well as) digital. Digital is good too, but film teaches you more. It is these days not expensive - you can buy a good quality 35mm film SLR for well under £200/€200. If you start with black-and-white film you can develop it at home yourself very easily and cheaply, then scan the negatives into your computer.
As for digital, whilst I think mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras are the future there's no doubt that right now conventional digital SLRs are the best, most flexible and probably cheapest way other than point-and-shoot bridge cameras (some of which are actually very good). I'd wait for MILC technology to stabilise before investing large amounts of money in it.
It is NOT about equipment, it is about you. In fact, I'd recommend restricting yourself to cheaper, simpler kit because it is this that will bring out the creativity, part of which is working round the limitations of what the camera and lens will allow you to portray. Thousands of Euros of equipment won't make you a better photographer, whereas a good photographer can get excellent images from a disposable camera. Note especially that film is less susceptible to technological advance than digital, the fundamentals not having changed for decades.
I'd suggest buying a used camera. Digital technology changes rapidly, so what today costs €10,000 tomorrow will be a few hundred in a second-hand shop. An "outdated" digital SLR will still produce perfectly good images capable of printing at A3 size or even larger. You don't really need more than about 10-12 megapixels unless you're doing exhibition size prints.
Lenses are more important than the camera. If you can afford it, buy a film and a digital SLR of the same brand so you can use the same lenses on both. Since I started using my father's AE-1 in the 1970s, my preference is for Canon, but Nikon is just as good, it's simply a matter of personal preference. Both have a very wide selection of lenses. Get a Canon EOS 35mm SLR and you can use modern EF-type autofocus lenses. The range of usable Nikon lenses is even greater since their old film and current digital models (largely) use the same lens mount design, whereas Canon changed from FD to EF in 1987 and the two are not interchangeable.
Not knowing enough about Nikon or other types, I would make Canon-specific recommendations so - a Canon 700D or 70D crop-frame digital SLR if you want new, or a used 450D for cheapness; a Canon EOS 3, 30 or 33 film SLR; the EF 50mm f/1.8 prime lens because it is cheap and optically good; a macro lens of 100mm focal length; a modest telephoto zoom; a wide-angle if you want interesting perspectives. You say video appeals to you - the Canon 70D is very good for video, especially coupled with some of the EF-S lenses with STM focusing motors. If you want old-school everything manual still photography, then get a Canon AE-1 and some FD type lenses.
But most of all, enjoy.
2
3,916 clicks
hi all, I need some advices about canon lenses.10-22 or 16-3
hinizturgay
15.03.10, 14:43
You must be using a crop sensor camera as the 10-22 is an EF-S lens and foes not fit the full frame cameras (like 5d).
with a crop sensor you must know that using an EF (not EF-S) means a multiplier of 1.6 to the focal length. So the 16-35 (which is a favorite of mine) becomes a 25-56. These are not close enough to do the same functions. The costs are not similar either as a 10-22 is a about $650 new and the 16-35 is about $1000 more. If you are beginning I suggest limiting the expense until you find your voice. Then spend resources there. You may find an specialty that pleases you and those lenses may be completely different than where you began.
Post Edited (14:56)[/quote]
Q.A.
21.12.14, 16:42
Q.A.
21.12.14, 16:42
You must be using a crop sensor camera as the 10-22 is an EF-S lens and foes not fit the full frame cameras (like 5d).
with a crop sensor you must know that using an EF (not EF-S) means a multiplier of 1.6 to the focal length. So the 16-35 (which is a favorite of mine) becomes a 25-56. These are not close enough to do the same functions. The costs are not similar either as a 10-22 is a about $650 new and the 16-35 is about $1000 more. If you are beginning I suggest limiting the expense until you find your voice. Then spend resources there. You may find an specialty that pleases you and those lenses may be completely different than where you began.
Post Edited (14:56)[/quote]
7
4,207 clicks
flashes de estudio
nestornino
26.03.14, 13:46
Please keep the discussion in .COM in the English language which is the common language in this forum.
Ruud van der Lubben
26.03.14, 23:42
Ruud van der Lubben
26.03.14, 23:42
Please keep the discussion in .COM in the English language which is the common language in this forum.
2
4,226 clicks
PRO 8-3 Robert Mehlan 1512779 - Family Business
TomS...
11.12.13, 16:02
Pro
Kai Uhlemeyer
16.12.13, 11:31
Kai Uhlemeyer
16.12.13, 11:31
Pro
16
3,405 clicks
Telephoto lens for CMOS
Joni Autio
05.05.12, 18:49
The sensor doesn't matter as much as the lens. As long as you don't push the ISO too high, you won't be able to tell it was taken with a "bad" camera. A cheap camera with a good lens will give you better results than a good camera with a cheap lens.
What's your budget and what are you planning to use it for?
Jefzor
16.05.13, 06:04
Jefzor
16.05.13, 06:04
The sensor doesn't matter as much as the lens. As long as you don't push the ISO too high, you won't be able to tell it was taken with a "bad" camera. A cheap camera with a good lens will give you better results than a good camera with a cheap lens.
What's your budget and what are you planning to use it for?
4
7,828 clicks
Nikon 70-300mm Lens
Larry Abruzzo
28.03.11, 09:10
55-200mm sharp, 200-300mm soft
Almost all portraits from http://3foto.ro/portrete/ are made with 55-300mm on D7000.
valt3r
06.01.13, 15:33
valt3r
06.01.13, 15:33
55-200mm sharp, 200-300mm soft
Almost all portraits from http://3foto.ro/portrete/ are made with 55-300mm on D7000.
6
7,872 clicks
To the
top