Comments
11
Information
| Section | People: Portrait |
| Views | 998 |
| Published | |
| Language |
|
| License |
Embed photo
Include in a comment, a description or a message to show this image.
Link copied...
Click on the link and use the key combination "Ctrl C" [Win] or "Cmd C" [Mac] to copy the link.
Share in Messenger
Insert the following link into the comment field of the desired conversation in Messenger using 'Paste' to send this image in the message.
Link copied...
Click on the link and use the key combination "Ctrl C" [Win] or "Cmd C" [Mac] to copy the link.
Jaime Crystal Attenborough 08/12/2005 18:05 Voting comment
i also agreecontra
Kim Clauson 08/12/2005 18:05 Voting comment
I have to agree with the others, Sorry Contra.Colin Karpeta 08/12/2005 18:05 Voting comment
Too bright, contra°°° celle °°° 08/12/2005 18:05 Voting comment
nothing to say its all above...contra
Oybe 08/12/2005 18:04 Voting comment
contraAnastasiya Ivanova 08/12/2005 18:04 Voting comment
Too bright, not bad perspective.Kay Wölfle 08/12/2005 18:04 Voting comment
Everything has been said. contraWhen 08/12/2005 18:04 Voting comment
Not at all gallery for a long list of reasons. The most glaring is the lack of contrast - seems you were going for a high key effect. Sharpness not there. Another, bad choice of garment - messy. Then bad hair and make up - it's important in a glamor portrait. The obvious peirced ear left bare. Tooooo sharp of an eye cut, just doesn't work, moving the face towards you would have given a better effect while till using a sexy cut. Cropping doesn't work. The nose needs to be within the cheek line. I think that's enough, but there is much more.JVision 08/12/2005 18:04 Voting comment
contraJan Van Der Hooft 08/12/2005 18:04 Voting comment
Sorry contra to much white lightRobert Riley 08/12/2005 18:04 Voting comment
Sorry Contra.