This website uses cookies to access various functions, personalize its advertising, and analyze traffic. Use of this website implies agreement with our use of cookies. More information  OK

What's new?

Andy Pomplun


World Member

What Is Art?

If only the spectators or auditors are infected by the feelings which the author has felt, it is art.
(Tolstoy)

Oh, I guess to make this one art, I have to tell you what I felt when I did this shot: "*#'#*~~~##***, I should really try harder to focus!"

:)))))

Comments 89

  • Antis 02/02/2014 1:11

    point without point;(:)
  • s.m.j.soghrati 02/01/2013 12:12

    agree
  • Alexsander B.B. 12/15/2010 7:01

    I like image visual influence & frame too)
  • Darkwanderer 11/21/2010 22:31

    amazing. nice work
  • muhammad karim 10/02/2010 19:38

    very inspiring and beyond imagination...great
    rgds
  • hedyeh 07/15/2010 12:25

    your finger :-))
    that is true?!!
  • Media Rahmani 06/25/2010 11:08

    stark............
  • Serge Sophienczuk-Wojczyszyn 06/20/2010 22:02

    Many thanks for the welcome mail.
    What is art? Does this photo answers? Or — the picture offered another question — more for feeling than for intellect. . . .
    The theme is profound: HJSyberberg in his Parsifal-installation (Documenta vii) shows the change of st. Graal radiance from red to white (and Mark the Gnostic in his pseudomiracle change white wine in transparent chalice to red, as st. Irinæus report), — blood will be light, flash will be spirit, hard work will be joyful contemplation of the fruits, — but the light may become bloody, spirit may become fleshly and contemplation may become as a hard work. All this is about art. And what is about photo? Does its question is “profound”? The spectator stops rhetorical talking about work — and looks — and that`s good result (Wagner`s Parsifal asked: “Wer ist der Gral?” Gurnemanz replayed: “Das sagt sich nicht. . . Sieh!”) . . . But does the pause in talking is really deep?
    Minimalism is in search of the symbol that pose obstacle for mind. This picture is good essay on such way, but not the invention. Standard format with nonrealistic minimal image and galvanizing question in title — bella idea! — But the frame of invitation mail substantially supports this paradox.
    The invention of said Mark Rothko (better — of the abstract expressionism) was the colored surface. When we abstract image from material surface — we may activate some other elements for replenishment of the language, e.g. integrate “literary” title, citation, author`s comment into image (imitation of poster). This is not the question of this successful attempt. But this set up a base for the successful work.
  • Rob7Crown 06/15/2010 3:38

    Art is what you create with your imaginary thought.
  • Hai Hoang 05/11/2010 11:42

    Day and Night
  • Dr.Szirmai János 05/07/2010 10:18

    Excellent composition! I like it very much! Many thank's for the fotomail! Hi János
  • Kambiz Bagheri 04/17/2010 6:12

    Thank you very much.
    Excellent !!!
  • Deb Watts 03/29/2010 0:06

    Thank you for your help with fotomail and my welcome. I am very much a newbie to all of this.
  • iyunk cruise 12/27/2009 13:01

    picture worth a thousandword
  • Dragomir Vukovic 12/21/2009 21:05

    excellent !

Information

Section
Folders user's favorites
Clicks 19,526
Published
Language
License

Public favourites