This website uses cookies to access various functions, personalize its advertising, and analyze traffic. Use of this website implies agreement with our use of cookies. More information  OK

What's new?

Dmitry Shamin

Free Member, Vsevolozhsk

Comments 27

  • BRYAN CRUTE 03/04/2007 7:27

    Lacks too much for the gallery. Contra
  • Jaime Crystal Attenborough 03/04/2007 7:27

    great perspective and colours and exposure, but why so small?
  • Herbert Wannhoff 03/04/2007 7:27

    °°°° P R O °°°°
  • Jim McKinniss 03/04/2007 7:27

    This image has visual appeal because of the composition and the colors.

    But I think the technical problems with noise and some glare is too much of a negative.

  • Daniel Metz 03/04/2007 7:26

    Very good work, but bad compression for the presentation, sorry, C
  • Felix Hug 03/04/2007 7:26

    technically is not there. Very grainy for no reason, reflections where ther should be none.

    i have seen many images similar to this, unfortunately better ones.

    Its a good picture, but not a gallery shot.

  • Abdul Khaliq 03/04/2007 7:26

  • Roberto Grilli 03/04/2007 7:26

    nice but not for the gallery.
  • Thomas. Kistler 03/04/2007 7:26

  • Micha Boland 03/04/2007 7:26

  • Ivano Cheli (1) 03/04/2007 7:26

  • Dominique Duriot 03/04/2007 7:26

    nice but not gallery
  • Cees Kuijs 03/04/2007 7:26

    Have too agree about the noise. skip for that.
  • Robert Riley 03/04/2007 7:26

    Agree with most above, way too noisy.
  • Patrick B. Parenteau 03/04/2007 7:26

    The colour, crop, noise and artifacts don't work for me. The image has been oversharpened and is too small. Contra
  • Geoff Ashton 03/04/2007 7:26

    89 k are maybe the couse of the noise in the sky
    would allso of preferd the light at the top to be compleat
    composition though is verry good
    so skip
  • Dave Donaldson 03/04/2007 7:26

    Like to have seen it loaded bigger only 88k, so contra
  • Sarah D. Kiefer 03/04/2007 7:26

    wonderful concept but too much noise in the sky. sorry, can't get past the technical glitches i see, contra.
  • Sus Bogaerts 03/04/2007 7:26

    There is some noise in the picture, but for me it is ok for the gallery. +
  • Olivier Vanbiervliet 03/04/2007 7:26

    I find the bright white light in the fg looking unpleasant while the bg buildings at the left side are too dark.
    Composition is ok, but overall for me not gallery.
  • Michael Henderson 03/04/2007 7:26

  • Peter. Gau 03/04/2007 7:26

    its ok, quite interesting, not so sure about the cut of streetlight on the bridge. That bothers me a little, skip
  • Tom McAlexander 03/04/2007 7:26

    Don't know yet. Coloring looks a bit artificial. Skip for now
  • Oliver Suhr 03/04/2007 7:26

    I think this is a very good and remarkable nightshot: Motive, composition and perpective are great. The soft tones are harmonic and the red line of the bridge is the dot on the i.
    For me: PRO!
  • BRYAN CRUTE 02/22/2007 15:20

    Terrific low light work.
    pov is perfect for this shot.