This is a pay function
If you are already a paying member you can use all the features of the fotocommunity from 4€ per month.
  • Read and write in all forums
  • look at nude pictures
  • take part in the gallery-voting
  • upload up to 30 pictures per week
> Become a premium member now

Attack! by Dmitri Zakovorotny



Post a new QuickMessage
24.03.2006 at 10:28h
, License: All pictures © by the senders.
Some sea-gulls & backlight


d1w.gifTo leave a comment please register first

Peter Mertz, 24.03.2006 at 10:31h

very well composed picture, I like it very much:-)

Ron Couwenberg, 24.03.2006 at 10:31h

Very impressive display of silhouettes formations. Love the exposure control.

Dmitri Zakovorotny, 24.03.2006 at 11:14h

Thank you Peter,Ron & Stefano for attention to my work.

Vladimir Danilov, 24.03.2006 at 14:20h

Hello, Dmitri!

Very impressive and masterful work!!! Outstanding technic. Will take it to my favorite collection.

Dmitri Zakovorotny, 24.03.2006 at 14:52h

Thanks Vladimir. I'll try to post only my best works

Janka Z, 24.03.2006 at 15:11h

I like the atmoshpere and overall feeling

Voting Center, 26.03.2006 at 16:39h

This photo was proposed for the gallery, as the voting ended with 22 pro und 28 contra votes. Maybe next time you will be more successful;-)

Vladimir Danilov, 26.03.2006 at 16:39h

This image has everything to call it impressive and masterful: impact composition, tender and comfortable toning, clear depth you can almost physically feel. A wonderful piece of our world masterfully presented.

Vladimir Danilov, 26.03.2006 at 16:39h

@Celal: I think it's just an optical illusion made by the shore-shapes. It's a master-hand applied here so I have no doubt the horizont-line is properly aligned.

Dennis Veldman, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

i dont notice anything from the horizon, because it isnt obvious in this photograph.
The birds look like they are drawn in.
Im not sure, maybe i will make a decission after a few looks, at different times of day.
at this moment, right now, i dont feel it yet.
Ill be back

Paul Grimshaw, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

Looked at the 'horizon' - you can't say it is not straight, because there is no water horizon or any natural verticals to refer to? - simply just shorelines visible and mountain tops, either of which can form anything from horizontal to vertical or completely random lines. Back to the important bit .. 'see with your heart, not your eyes' ;0)

Celal Tayar, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

yessssss....good u r my dear fc- souls....

delete my first vote
and i am giving a BIG heart PRO

c yaa<----soulsmile to ya

Fabio Dammy, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

I agree as Celal, the orizont is slight, but for me it's a little matter on a good shot like this, so i vote PRO
Fabio :)

@ Danilov : try to reduce the level of this foto down you will see that the orizont is not alligned.

Vladimir Danilov, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

@Fabio: hmmm... it's getting already interesting... I should ask the author... 8-//

Just curious, Fabio - what line did you measure on? I still can not find any to refer.

Celal Tayar, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

the line is straight in the background.....
take a loook and u will see ;-))))

but no matter......i see it slight<---- and thats how i see it and saw it.....
but i`ve put the level down ;-))))

Vladimir Danilov, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

@Celal: let's wait what the author says... I have written to him. ;-))

Paul Grimshaw, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

LOL @ Celal - it was just a joke mate :0) Nobody can tell if it is straight or not so it doesn't matter :0)

Victor Servián, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

Sorry. Pro.

Victor Servián, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

Perdón, quise decir CONTRA.

Robert Riley, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

So, the horizon is straight, or not, I cannot tell, and it does not matter. PRO.

Ron Couwenberg, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h


Peter Kis kalóz, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

The shoreline is not straight (0,3 degrees) but the shoreline is far , so we can say this is the horizon.:)

Falko Seegel, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

O.k. the horizon is hardly visible and not straight the overall impact is less attacky, it is more honouring the number 3.
You should have cropped more seriously the right part right away. Colors are a bit to weary.
I say pro for the invisible hints and secret meanings.

Valfoto, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

For the mood created................. PRO

Dominic Falcone, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h


Dagmar E., 26.03.2006 at 16:40h


Patrick Parenteau, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

Pro - so subtle - pastel and elegant with lots of space to fly. The birds make the shot.

Abdul Khaliq, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

Guys, Your Pro's are taking me deep into the Picture so many times but still i coudn't come to any discission to give PRO.
@Valdimir, is there some thing hidden or out of my tought ?
I have to still vote.

Wen P, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

I'm just not grooving on it. Don't know why, just not my thing, maybe because it is TOO well composed, seems contrived, too textbook.

Christian Knospe, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h


Jan Van Der Hooft, 26.03.2006 at 16:40h

Dont like the light like this


Dmitri Zakovorotny, 27.03.2006 at 9:12h

Thanks for opinions.Your attention is very important for me.

hrishikesh thakur, 19.05.2009 at 19:44h

yesssssssssssssssssssssssss ! nice shot

d1w.gifTo leave a comment please register first

Information about the photo
  • 1.095 Clicks
  • 1 times saved as favourite

Link for the following services:

previous (101/100)