This is a pay function
If you are already a paying member you can use all the features of the fotocommunity from 4€ per month.
  • Read and write in all forums
  • look at nude pictures
  • take part in the gallery-voting
  • upload up to 30 pictures per week
> Become a premium member now
 

SPAROWHAWK 2 by Tony (Anthony) Rowell

SPAROWHAWK 2


by 

Post a new QuickMessage
21.02.2008 at 18:24h
, License: All pictures  by the senders.
 

Comments:

d1w.gifTo leave a comment please register first





archiek , 21.02.2008 at 20:57h

Of the sparrowhawk photos I like this one the best! Hawks are hard to capture. I've tried, so congratulations. -archie


CsomorLászló , 22.02.2008 at 10:38h

Yesss, pro!
bw
CsL



Voting Center, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

 
This photo was proposed for the gallery, as the voting ended with 36 pro und 81 contra votes. Maybe next time you will be more successful;-)


Pascal Viyer, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

Good choice dear H*
pro



DSK , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

++


AL dente , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

pro


Stefan Seith von Benrath, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h




PRO



BRYAN CRUTE, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

Pro


Theo Weijmer, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

There are some burned out parts on the bird and I think the motion blur should not be there, although a nice capture, not gallery to me.


, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

++


Geoff Ashton , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

obviously a difficult shot
just i have a few problems with the editing
the hawk has a halo from oversharpening
the bg is noisy
the blownout parts could be better don in ps
sorry



Norbert Ruffert, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

pro


Véronique Soulier , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

sharpness and bg.. something missing skip now,


Valfoto, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

contra


Canan Oner , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

PRO !!!!


Ilidio Fernandes , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

+


Foto Lanz , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

pro


Fredrick Steven Adam , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

Very nice capture, but a shorter exposure and higher ISO would have produced a sharper image and better colors, IMHO...
skip



archiek , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

To me it looks like there was a wind ruffling a few feathers. A photo in the wild, I say pro. -archie


redfox-dream-art-photography, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

PRO


Andrea Se. , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

It's never easy too take a photo of wildlife and I would love this one to be mine, but for gallery it lacks a bit in quality.
Some parts are oversharpened and some blown out. The background is grainy.
skip



Thor Schulze, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

++


Takis.K , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

+


Rob Nagelhout , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

Sorry, to much sharpening
Contra



Rami Harcsztark , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

s


Carlo Capobianchi , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

pro


Peter Kuster , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

pro


Angéla Vicedomini, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

+++PRO+++


Jorge Pérez Carsí, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

Sorry skip
J



Zsolt Kiss, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

PRO! :o)


Anca Silvia B., 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

pro


Claire Laira, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

+


Leonid Khodyrev, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

+


aw masry , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

+


Massimo Carolla, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

+


Denis , 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

+


Vesela Maleeva, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

pro


Robert L. Roux, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

P R O -
the wildest ones
are the most difficult to capture ...



Luigi Scorsino, 23.02.2008 at 20:53h

++pro++


d1w.gifTo leave a comment please register first


 
Information about the photo
Tags
Link/Embed

Link for the following services:

No more ads ?



previous (101/100)